Connect with us

Crime

IPOB Slams FG As Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Resumes: Judicial Terrorism

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu

IPOB Slams FG As Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Resumes: Judicial Terrorism

IPOB Slams FG as Nnamdi Kanu’s trial resumes. As the trial of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, resumes today, the group has strongly condemned the Federal Government, describing the move as a “declaration of war on justice” and “an act of judicial terrorism.”

In a statement, IPOB spokesman Emma Powerful denounced the resumed trial, calling it not only a violation of the Nigerian Constitution but also a flagrant breach of international law and a mockery of natural justice.

“We call on all lovers of freedom, justice, and the rule of law, both within Nigeria and globally, to stand against this travesty and demand the immediate and unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu,” the statement read.

Powerful further accused the Nigerian government of denying Kanu access to consular assistance and legal representation during his controversial rendition, worsening what he termed an already illegal action.

“The resumption of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s trial is not just unlawful; it is an act of judicial terrorism.

“The government’s defiance of court orders — including the July 2021 ruling by the ECOWAS Court and the October 2022 Court of Appeal judgment discharging Kanu — shows blatant disregard for the rule of law,” Powerful stated.

Quoting Kanu, he added: “When the rule of law itself seems lunatic, who knows where injustice lies?”

He warned that the Federal High Court, under the stewardship of Justices Binta Nyako and Omotosho, risks “etching its name in infamy” by proceeding with what IPOB views as an illegitimate trial.

The group also charged the senior advocates on Kanu’s defence team to remain steadfast and not lend legitimacy to a process they insist is “void ab initio.”

Powerful further argued that Kanu remains a victim of an assassination attempt in Nigeria, which forced him to seek refuge abroad.

“There is no law, either in Nigeria, on earth, or in heaven, that sanctions the kidnapping of a person who fled an assassination attempt,” he said.

Nnamdi Kanu

Nnamdi Kanu

He called on the international community — including the United Nations, African Union, European Union, and global human rights organizations — to intervene and halt what IPOB described as a “judicial travesty.”

“The rule of law is not a suggestion; it is the foundation of any civilized society. To proceed with Mazi Kanu’s trial is to declare war on justice itself,” the statement concluded.

Crime

Navy Rescues 2 Kidnapped Victims, Recovers Stolen Outboard Engines in Akwa Ibom

Published

on

By

Navy

Navy Rescues 2 Kidnapped Victims, Recovers Stolen Outboard Engines in Akwa Ibom

The Nigerian Navy has rescued 2 kidnapped victims and recovered several stolen outboard engines during an operation against sea robbery and kidnapping in the Ibeno general area of Akwa Ibom State on 30 September 2026.
Eereporter.com

The operation followed credible information on the activities of suspected sea robbers and kidnappers targeting fishermen and forcibly taking away fishing boats and outboard engines. In response, the Nigerian Navy Ship JUBILEE Maritime Quick Response Team, Ibeno, swiftly mobilised to the area to counter the threat.

During the operation, the naval team encountered 2 boats suspected to be operated by the criminals, prompting the occupants to flee into adjoining creeks. In the ensuing pursuit, the suspects abandoned one of the boats containing several stolen outboard engines and the 2 kidnapped victims, who were immediately rescued by the naval team and escorted to safety. The recovered outboard engines were secured for verification and further necessary action, while efforts are ongoing to locate and apprehend the fleeing suspects.

The successful operation underscores the Nigerian Navy’s sustained commitment to Search and Rescue (SAR), the protection of lives and the security of legitimate maritime activities across Nigeria’s waters. Through its network of ships, bases, surveillance systems, maritime quick response teams and other operational elements, the Nigerian Navy continues to maintain a presence across the maritime domain, enabling timely responses to distress situations and emerging security threats.

Navy

Navy

The operation also demonstrates the importance of credible intelligence and community support in enhancing maritime security. The Nigerian Navy therefore encourages coastal communities, fishermen and other maritime stakeholders to continue providing timely information that could assist in preventing criminal activities and responding rapidly to persons in distress.

The Nigerian Navy remains resolute in safeguarding Nigeria’s maritime domain and will continue to sustain proactive patrols, Search and Rescue operations, and intelligence-driven interventions aimed at protecting lives and property while denying criminal elements freedom of action in the nation’s waterways.
Eereporter.com

Continue Reading

Crime

Cyber-Fraud: EFCC Secures Final Forfeiture of 431 Phones from Chinese Convicts

Published

on

By

Kwara Ex-Governor Ahmed

Cyber-Fraud: EFCC Secures Final Forfeiture of 431 Phones from Chinese Convicts

The Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, secured the final forfeiture of 431 mobile phones to the Federal Government.
Eereporter.com

The mobile phones were linked to Chinese cyber-fraud operators who had previously been convicted by the court.

Justice Dehinde Dipeolu of the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos issued the forfeiture order following a motion on notice filed by the EFCC through its counsel, Hannatu Kofarnaisa.

The court had earlier granted an interim forfeiture order on July 8, 2026, directing the EFCC to publish the order in a national newspaper to give interested persons or entities an opportunity to show cause why the phones should not be permanently forfeited.

While moving the application for final forfeiture, Kofarnaisa informed the court that the EFCC had complied with the directive by publishing the notice in The Guardian newspaper on August 11, 2026.

She added that no individual or entity came forward to contest the forfeiture within the period stipulated by the court.

The application was supported by an affidavit deposed to by an EFCC operative, Christopher Augustine, who detailed the findings of the Commission’s investigation.

According to the affidavit, the 431 mobile phones were linked to a cyber-fraud operation allegedly involving Chinese and Nigerian youths at a facility known as “HK” in Victoria Island, Lagos which was used to train and deploy Nigerian youths and foreign nationals to carry out romance, investment and cryptocurrency fraud.

While noting that victims in the United States, Canada, Mexico and parts of Europe were major targets, he revealed that a sting operation conducted on December 10, 2024, led to the arrest of more than 700 individuals, including about 500 Nigerians, 148 Chinese , 40 Filipinos and other foreign nationals.

The affidavit also stated that Genting International Company Limited (GICL), allegedly controlled by Huang Haoyu, also known as Ken, a Chinese and other foreign nationals, were involved in the operation.

According to the EFCC, Huang and GICL were subsequently charged with seven counts bordering on cyber terrorism, possession of fraudulent documents, failure to declare activities to the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering (SCUML), illegal foreign exchange transactions and money laundering.

The Commission stated that Huang and GICL pleaded guilty to the charges and were subsequently convicted and sentenced by the court.

He stated that the 431 devices were reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities and were therefore subject to forfeiture pursuant to Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006.

Kwara Ex-Governor Ahmed

Fraud

After hearing the submissions of the EFCC and reviewing the affidavit evidence before the court, Justice Dipeolu held that the application had merit.

The judge consequently ordered the final forfeiture of the 431 mobile phones to the Federal Government of Nigeria.
Eereporter.com

Continue Reading

Crime

EFCC Arraigns Businessman Enyinnwa for Alleged N30.14m Fraud

Published

on

By

EFCC

EFCC Arraigns Businessman Enyinnwa for Alleged N30.14m Fraud

The Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, arraigned a businessman, Christopher Elendu Enyinnwa, before Justice Olubunmi Abike-Fadipe of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos, for an alleged N30.14 million fraud.
Eereporter.com

Enyinnwa was arraigned on a four-count charge bordering on fraudulent conversion and obtaining money under false pretences in connection with the proposed supply of slippers from China.

The defendant was alleged to have collected a total sum of N30,140,000 from the petitioner, Chidebere Love Okafor, for the supply of slippers from China.

Counts One reads:

“Christopher Elendu Enyinwa sometime in August 2024, at Lagos within the Ikeja Judicial Division, fraudulently converted for your own use the sum of Two Million Naira (N2,000,000.00) , property of Chidebere Love Okafor.”

Count Two reads:

“Christopher Elendu Enyinwa sometime in August 2024, at Lagos within the Ikeja Judicial Division, fraudulently converted for your own use the sum of Eleven Million, Nine Hundred and Twenty-Three Thousand Naira (N11,923,000.00), property of Chidebere Love Okafor.”

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Following his plea, prosecution counsel, Fanen Anum, informed the court that the prosecution was ready for trial and had two witnesses available in court.

Defence counsel, K.C. Atuenyi, however, sought an adjournment to enable him prepare for trial, explaining that he had only prepared for the arraignment.

Justice Abike-Fadipe overruled the defence request and directed the prosecution to call its first witness.

The first prosecution witness, PW1, Okafor Love Chidebere, works in Gomac Industry Nigeria Limited and the petitioner, told the court that she knew the defendant as a fellow church member.

According to her, Enyinnwa had told her that he travelled to China for business and could assist her in purchasing slippers from China.

She said, “He is my church member. I knew him in church. He told me he buys goods, and I approached him to buy slippers in China for me.”

The witness explained that after discussing the product she wanted to purchase, she gave the defendant a sample of the slippers to take to China.

She said the defendant subsequently provided a price for the goods, which she initially considered high because she was negotiating with another company offering a lower price.

According to her, she eventually trusted Enyinnwa because he was her church member and agreed to proceed with the transaction.

She told the court that the defendant requested an initial deposit of N2 million, which she paid into his Access Bank account in August 2024.

The witness further stated that after the defendant returned from China, he showed them samples of the slippers, following which some amendments were made and the samples were returned to him.

She said the defendant later requested N11,923,000 to commence production, which was also paid into his Access Bank account.

According to her, the defendant subsequently demanded another N15 million as the balance, which was paid to him.

She said, “After that, he told us that he will go back to ship the goods in a very short while.”

However, when the defendant did not travel as expected, the witness said they contacted him and he claimed that he was having issues with his traveling documents.

She further told the court that, after several calls, the defendant requested another N2 million to facilitate his traveling documents.

According to her, she and her husband agreed to provide the money because they wanted him to travel back to China and complete the transaction.

The witness said the defendant eventually travelled to China in February 2025 and later informed them that he had shipped goods, including clothes, and would provide the relevant documents when the shipment arrived.

She said the goods, however, did not arrive as promised.

The witness further narrated that her pastor subsequently summoned her to his office and informed her that some of the defendant’s claims were allegedly untrue.

EFCC

EFCC

She said members of the church intervened in the matter and the defendant promised to refund the money, but had yet to do so.

According to PW1, “The total amount is N30,140,000. Up till now, I have not seen the goods and the money.”

During cross-examination, defence counsel, K.C. Atuenyi, requested another date to cross-examine the witness.

The prosecution thereafter urged the court to remand the defendant in a Correctional facility.

Justice Abike-Fadipe adjourned the matter to November 26, December 16 and 17, 2026, for continuation of trial and ordered that the defendant be remanded in a Correctional facility.
Eereporter.com

Continue Reading

Trending