Connect with us

Crime

Witness Reveals How Alleged ₦5.78bn Kwara UBEC Funds Were Spent On Salaries, Loans, Road Projects: EFCC

Published

on

EFCC Arraigns Gidado Ibrahim

Witness Reveals How Alleged ₦5.78bn Kwara UBEC Funds Were Spent On Salaries, Loans, Road Projects: EFCC

Witness reveals How alleged ₦5.78bn Kwara UBEC funds were apent on salaries, loans, road projects: EFCC. The trial of former Kwara State Governor, Abdulfatah Ahmed, and his Commissioner for Finance, Ademola Banu, over the alleged diversion of ₦5.78 billion Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) funds resumed on Monday, February 16, 2026, with fresh revelations before Justice Mahmud Abdulgafar of the Kwara State High Court sitting in Ilorin.

Testifying as the sixth prosecution witness, an investigator with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Stanley Ujilibo, told the court that funds released to the Kwara State Government for 2013, 2014 and 2015 were not utilised in line with the action plans submitted by the Kwara State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB).

Ahmed and Banu are being prosecuted by the Ilorin Zonal Directorate of the EFCC, over an alleged diversion of part of ₦5.78 billion UBEC funds contrary to the purpose for which the funds were released.

Led in evidence by Adebisi Adeniyi, the witness (Ujilibo), informed the court that the Kwara State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) had presented detailed action plans outlining various educational projects across the state. With with evidence of its counterpart funding, the Board planned to persuade the Federal Government through UBEC to release the matching grants for the benefit of pupils in primary and junior secondary schools.

Addressing the court, Ujilibo stated that, “My Lord, a team of officials from the Kwara State Universal Basic Education Board, SUBEB comprising the Chairman, Director, Finance and Account, Project Manager and top management officials went to Abuja to defend the action plans for 2013, 2014 and 2015, stating the deplorable state of Kwara State Primary and Junior Secondary Education across the 16 Local Government Areas of the State”.

However, the PW 6 disclosed that investigations revealed that the money was moved from the UBEC matching grant accounts into the Kwara State Government’s central account domiciled in a commercial bank.

He added that while a portion of the funds was spent on projects such as the reconstruction of Omosebi Bridge, Coca-Cola Road Bridge, Michael Imodu/Afon Junction Road, Lafiaji Township Road and the rehabilitation of the Ilorin water supply network, these projects had no direct link to basic education.

EFCC Arraigns Gidado Ibrahim

EFCC

He further told the court that the sum N952,297,227.30 (Nine Hundred and Fifty Two Million, Two Hundred and Ninety Seven Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty Seven Naira, Thirty Kobo) being the UBEC fund for 2014 was used for principal liquidation of loan. He added that a request allegedly signed by the second defendant (Banu) sought approval to obtain a ₦1 billion loan from SUBEB counterpart funds to augment workers’ salaries.

According to the witness, the funds meant for improving infrastructure and learning conditions in primary and junior secondary schools were ultimately deployed for purposes outside their statutory mandate and without direct benefit to pupils.

Following the conclusion of the prosecution’s examination-in-chief, Justice Abdulgafar adjourned the matter until April 20, 2026, for the cross-examination of the witness.

Crime

EFCC Arraigns One Abdullahi Aminu for N4.3m Fraud In Maiduguri

Published

on

By

EFCC

EFCC Arraigns One Abdullahi Aminu for N4.3m Fraud In Maiduguri

The Maiduguri Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Thursday, April 9, 2026 arraigned one Abdullahi Aminu before Justice Aisha Kumaliya of the Borno State High Court sitting in Maiduguri.

The defendant was arraigned on a one- count charge bordering on criminal misappropriation to the tune of N4, 305,000.00 (Four Million, Three Hundred and Five Thousand Naira).

The charge reads: “That you, Abdullahi Aminu sometimes in 2025 at Maiduguri, Borno State, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court dishonestly convert to your own use the aggregate sum of N4,305,000.00 (Four Million, Three Hundred and Five Thousand Naira), monies belonging to Jibrin Abdulrahman purportedly as payment for the supply of rice, thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 296 and punishable under Section 297 of the Borno State Penal Code Law and Other Matters Connected Therewith Law, 2023.”

EFCC

EFCC

The defendant pleaded “not guilty” to the charge preferred against him by the EFCC. Following his plea, prosecution counsel A.D Abdulmalik prayed for a trial date and urged the court to remand the defendant in a Correctional facility.

Thereafter, Justice Kumaliya adjourned till April 21, 2026 for commencement of trial and remanded the defendant in Maiduguri Maximum Correctional facility.

He was arrested when he allegedly dishonestly converted to his own use the sum of N4, 305,000.00 (Four Million, Three Hundred and Five Thousand Naira) that was meant for the supply of rice.

Continue Reading

Abuja

EFCC Busts Yahoo Academy In FCT, Arrests 31 Suspects

Published

on

By

Yahoo Boys School

EFCC Busts Yahoo Academy In FCT, Arrests 31 Suspects

Yahoo academy. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Thursday, April 9, 2026 arrested 31 suspected internet fraudsters in a sting operation at an internet fraud academy, situated in Becki Estate, Karu, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

The suspects, comprising two kingpins and interns, were nabbed while undergoing internet fraud tutorials. Items recovered from them include phones, 18 laptop computers and other gadgets.

Investigation by the EFCC revealed that some of the interns were lured all the way from Benue State by the academy proprietors with the promise of job offers, but upon settling down at the facility, were handed communication devices, computers and software, setting the stage for their training in cyber fraud.

To enforce compliance and dedication, the proprietors house the recruits in the academy and restrict their movements strictly within the perimeters of the facility and forcibly took possession of their mobile phones, thus totally cutting them off from the outside world.

Yahoo Boys School

EFCC Busts Yahoo Academy In FCT

Furthermore, corporal punishment was the order of the day, with heavy-handed physical assault meted out to interns who were seen to be recalcitrant.

The suspects will be charged to court as soon as investigations are concluded.

Continue Reading

Crime

EFCC Appeals Acquittal Of NNDC Director, Omatsuli, Three Others In Alleged N3.6Bn Fraud

Published

on

By

EFCC

EFCC Appeals Acquittal Of NNDC Director, Omatsuli, Three Others In Alleged N3.6Bn Fraud

Alleged N3.6Bn fraud. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has filed a notice of appeal before the Court of Appeal, Lagos seeking the setting aside of the judgment of Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos acquitting and discharging a former Executive Director of Projects at the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC, Engr. Tuoyo Omatsuli alongside Francis Momoh, Don Parker Properties Limited and Building Associates Limited over an alleged ₦3.6 billion fraud.

In a Notice of Appeal filed on Thursday, April 9, 2026, the EFCC, through its counsel, Ekene Iheanacho, SAN, faulted the judgment of the trial court and based its appeal at the Court of Appeal on seven grounds. The Commission is also seeking reliefs set out in the Appeal.

Justice Osiagor on March 3, 2026 cleared all the four defendants of money laundering allegations stating that the prosecution did not sufficiently establish the offences contained in the 46-count charge filed against them by the EFCC, despite the volume of evidence presented during the retrial, including testimonies from 16 witnesses and 34 exhibits.

The 1st defendant had earlier been acquitted in 2020, at No- case submission while the court held that the other defendants alleged to have assisted him in laundering the funds were directed to enter their defences. This prompted the EFCC to appeal to the Court of Appeal and the appellate court set aside the ruling of the trial court. The court also dismissed the appeal of the other defendants who had also appealed against the ruling of the trial court which held that they had cases to answer.

In its judgment, the Court of Appeal found that the payment of the sum of N3, 645, 000,000.00 from Prosecuting Witness 4, PW4, who was a contractor to NDDC to the 1st defendant, Omatsuli, through his friend’s company, the Building Associates Ltd, the 4th defendant, amounted to an act of gratification for which the defendants needed to make explanations. The court made references to the provisions of Section 8, 17, 19 of the ICPC Act and the 5th schedule to the Constitution.

The Notice of Appeal filed by the Commission alleged that the new trial Judge, Justice Osiagor who took over the proceeding following the retirement of the former trial Judge, Justice Saidu, relied on the record of the previous trial but disregarded the specific findings made by the Court of Appeal on the testimony of the prosecution witness. It is the position of the Commission in its Notice of Appeal that the trial Judge, Osiagor did not properly evaluate the evidence before it. That the trial judge misconceived the law and the evidence lead by both PW4 and PW15 during trial which showed that PW15 who was also a director at NDDC approached PW4 , a contractor to the Commission, with the request to appreciate the members of the Board whenever PW4 was paid his fees by the Board so as to enable them sought out restive youths in the Niger Delta area.

Accordingly , PW4 paid money to members of the Board including the 1st defendant who received his own through the 4th defendant’s bank account. The 1st defendant who was also a signatory to the account of NDDC upon receipt of the funds, applied most of the funds in the purchase of choice properties in Lagos in the name of the 2nd defendant which is his private company. That the N3.6bn was never used for any youth- related matters. Infact, the properties acquired with the funds have been forfeited in a Non-conviction based asset forfeiture on the strength of the same evidence adduced during trial. That the forfeiture was also affirmed by the Court of Appeal in the civil case.

The Commission further contends that the trial Judge did not make reference to any of the anti corruption legislations like the ICPC Act, 5th Schedule to the Constitution, CCB Act in determining whether the money paid was proceeds of unlawful act. That the trial judge failed to appreciate the case of the prosecution on the nature of the gratuitous payment received by the 1st defendant.

EFCC

EFCC

It was also part of the grouse of the Commission that evidence was led by PW4 and PW13 with documents in support, which showed that in order to cover up the illicit act, the 1st defendant withdrew as a director in the 2nd defendant and pleaded with PW4 to issue a sub contract document to cover the N3.6bn payment.

It stated that these pieces of evidence were neither contradicted as found by the Court of Appeal but the trial Judge disregarded those findings which were commended to the court.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the Appeal.

Continue Reading

Trending